LibGuides: Quantitative study designs: Cross-Sectional Studies (2024)

References and Further Reading

Australian Government Department of Health. (2003). The Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing (NSMHWB). 2019, from https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/mental-health/national-survey-mental-health-and-wellbeing-summary-results/2007

Bowers, D. a., Bewick, B., House, A., & Owens, D. (2013). Understanding clinical papers (Third edition. ed.): Wiley Blackwell.

Gravetter, F. J. a., & Forzano, L.-A. B. (2012). Research methods for the behavioral sciences (Fourth edition. ed.): Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Greenhalgh, T. a. (2014). How to read a paper : the basics of evidence-based medicine (Fifth edition. ed.): John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Hoffmann, T. a., Bennett, S. P., & Mar, C. D. (2017). Evidence-Based Practice Across the Health Professions (Third edition. ed.): Elsevier.

Howitt, D., & Cramer, D. (2008). Introduction to research methods in psychology (Second edition. ed.): Prentice Hall.

Kelly, P. J., Kyngdon, F., Ingram, I., Deane, F. P., Baker, A. L., & Osborne, B. A. (2018). The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire‐8: Psychometric properties in a cross‐sectional survey of people attending residential substance abuse treatment. Drug and Alcohol Review, 37(1), 79-86. doi: 10.1111/dar.12522

Lawrence, D., Hanco*ck, K. J., & Kisely, S. (2013). The gap in life expectancy from preventable physical illness in psychiatric patients in Western Australia: retrospective analysis of population based registers. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 346(7909), 13-13.

Nasir, B. F., Toombs, M. R., Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan, S., Kisely, S., Gill, N. S., Black, E., Ranmuthugala, G., Ostini, R., Nicholson, G. C., Hayman, N., & Beccaria, G.. (2018). Common mental disorders among Indigenous people living in regional, remote and metropolitan Australia: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, 8(6). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020196

Robson, C., & McCartan, K. (2016). Real world research (Fourth Edition. ed.): Wiley.

Sedgwick, P. (2014). Cross sectional studies: advantages and disadvantages. BMJ : British Medical Journal, 348, g2276. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g2276

Setia, M. S. (2016). Methodology Series Module 3: Cross-sectional Studies. Indian journal of dermatology, 61(3), 261-264. doi: 10.4103/0019-5154.182410

Shafiei, T., Biggs, L. J., Small, R., McLachlan, H. L., & Forster, D. A. (2018). Characteristics of women calling the panda perinatal anxiety & depression australia national helpline: A cross-sectional study. Archives of Women's Mental Health. doi: 10.1007/s00737-018-0868-4

Van Heyningen, T., Honikman, S., Myer, L., Onah, M. N., Field, S., & Tomlinson, M. (2017). Prevalence and predictors of anxiety disorders amongst low-income pregnant women in urban South Africa: a cross-sectional study. Archives of Women's Mental Health(6), 765. doi: 10.1007/s00737-017-0768-z

Vogt, W. P. (2005). Dictionary of statistics & methodology : a nontechnical guide for the social sciences (Third edition. ed.): Sage Publications.

LibGuides: Quantitative study designs: Cross-Sectional Studies (2024)

FAQs

Can a quantitative study be cross-sectional? ›

An analytical cross-sectional study is a type of quantitative, non-experimental research design. These studies seek to "gather data from a group of subjects at only one point in time" (Schmidt & Brown, 2019, p. 206).

What is the sample size for quantitative cross-sectional study? ›

Within a cross-sectional study a sample size of at least 60 participants is recommended, although this will depend on suitability to the research question and the variables being measured. A suitable number of variables.

What is one major drawback of a cross-sectional design study? ›

These studies are conducted relatively faster and are inexpensive. However, due to the nature of study design, in general, it is difficult to derive causal relationships from cross-sectional analysis.

What data collection technique is most appropriate for a quantitative cross-sectional study? ›

Most cross-sectional studies are quantitative. They gather data through interviews, questionnaires, and focus groups over a certain period in time which may be in the past or the present, and then analyze the results.

Can a cross-sectional study be both qualitative and quantitative? ›

Cross-sectional research can be both qualitative and quantitative.

What are the limitations of a cross-sectional study? ›

Cross-sectional studies cannot establish a cause-and-effect relationship or analyze behavior over a period of time. To investigate cause and effect, you need to do a longitudinal study or an experimental study.

How many sample size is enough for quantitative research? ›

If the research has a relational survey design, the sample size should not be less than 30. Causal-comparative and experimental studies require more than 50 samples. In survey research, 100 samples should be identified for each major sub-group in the population and between 20 to 50 samples for each minor sub-group.

What is a sufficient sample size for quantitative research? ›

If you test with too many, you're essentially throwing your money away. We want to strike the perfect balance — collecting enough data points to be confident in our results, but not so many that we're wasting precious research funding. In most cases, we recommend 40 participants for quantitative studies.

What should be a good sample size for quantitative research? ›

Small populations (less than 500): A larger sample size is generally recommended, aiming for at least 50% of the population. Large populations (greater than 5000): Smaller percentages suffice, typically between 17% and 27%.

What is one strength of cross-sectional research design? ›

Unlike other types of observational studies, cross-sectional studies do not follow individuals up over time. They are usually inexpensive and easy to conduct. They are useful for establishing preliminary evidence in planning a future advanced study.

Why are cross-sectional studies unsuccessful? ›

However, it is important to be aware of the predictive limitations of cross-sectional studies: “the primary limitation of the cross-sectional study design is that because the exposure and outcome are simultaneously assessed, there is generally no evidence of a temporal relationship between exposure and outcome.”

What are the pros and cons of cross-sectional study design? ›

Pros and Cons of Cross-Sectional Surveys
  • They're Inexpensive and Fast.
  • They Provide Data on Multiple Variables.
  • They Often Prompt Additional Research.
  • Inability to Determine Cause and Effect.
  • Existence of Cohort Differences.
  • Potential for Survey Bias.
Nov 16, 2021

What is a key feature of a cross-sectional study? ›

The key features of a cross-sectional study are as given below: The cross-sectional study is carried out at a single moment by comparing different population . The research can examine a wide range of population-based on different factors such as age, earnings, and sex.

What are the two types of cross-sectional studies? ›

Cross-sectional studies can be used for both analytical and descriptive purposes: An analytical study tries to answer how or why a certain outcome might occur. A descriptive study only summarizes said outcome using descriptive statistics.

What is an example of a cross-sectional study? ›

The number of people in a population with diabetes who are obese and the number of people in a population with diabetes who are not obese could be assessed using a cross-sectional design, this would be an example of an analytical cross- sectional study.

What type of study is a cross-sectional study? ›

Cross-sectional studies are observational studies that analyze data from a population at a single point in time. They are often used to measure the prevalence of health outcomes, understand determinants of health, and describe features of a population.

Can you have a qualitative cross-sectional study? ›

This research then helps generate hypotheses for future study and ultimately leads to improvements in health and health systems. Within health care, most qualitative studies are cross-sectional.

What is cross-sectional descriptive quantitative study? ›

Cross-sectional studies are observational in nature and are known as descriptive research, not causal or relational, meaning that you can't use them to determine the cause of something, such as a disease. Researchers record the information that is present in a population, but they do not manipulate variables.

What types of research methods cross-sectional study? ›

Revised on June 22, 2023. A cross-sectional study is a type of research design in which you collect data from many different individuals at a single point in time. In cross-sectional research, you observe variables without influencing them.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Virgilio Hermann JD

Last Updated:

Views: 6149

Rating: 4 / 5 (41 voted)

Reviews: 88% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Virgilio Hermann JD

Birthday: 1997-12-21

Address: 6946 Schoen Cove, Sipesshire, MO 55944

Phone: +3763365785260

Job: Accounting Engineer

Hobby: Web surfing, Rafting, Dowsing, Stand-up comedy, Ghost hunting, Swimming, Amateur radio

Introduction: My name is Virgilio Hermann JD, I am a fine, gifted, beautiful, encouraging, kind, talented, zealous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.