Cloud computing is no longer a debate about if to embrace the cloud, but how to do it.
This guide breaks down the strengths and weaknesses of each cloud option. We’ll explore the speed and power of cloud-native, the flexibility of cloud-agnostic, and even peek at the hybrid option, to help you choose the right cloud strategy for your business.
Understanding the basics
The key difference between cloud-native and cloud-agnostic approaches lies in their philosophy of building and deploying applications in the cloud.
Cloud-native applications are specifically designed for cloud environments, leveraging features like microservices, containers, and orchestration tools for high performance and scalability. They’re tailored to a specific cloud provider, potentially leading to vendor lock-in but offering optimized performance.
Pros:
- High performance and scalability
- Quick development and deployment
- Efficiency in cloud resource usage
Cons:
- Requires specialized skills
- Risk of being locked into one provider
- Potentially higher costs
A cloud-native approach can be ideal for organizations that prioritize high performance, scalability, and rapid development within a specific cloud environment.
On the other hand, cloud-agnostic applications and systems are designed to be independent of any specific cloud provider. This means they can be easily moved or ported between different cloud platforms, such as Amazon Web Services (AWS) or Google Cloud Platform (GCP), without major changes or disruptions.
They use standard technologies and open-source tools to run seamlessly across any cloud platform but may sacrifice some performance and functionality compared to their cloud-native counterparts.
Pros:
- Freedom to choose any cloud provider
- Potential cost savings by avoiding premium services
- Simplicity in development and management
Cons:
- May not reach the same performance levels
- Might miss out on some advanced cloud features
- Compatibility across different platforms can be a challenge
Overall, a cloud-agnostic approach can be a good choice for organizations that prioritize flexibility, vendor independence, and portability over the absolute highest performance.
The best of both worlds
Hybrid cloud offers a middle ground between cloud-native and cloud-agnostic, allowing you to leverage the benefits of both.
It allows you to leverage the strengths of both public cloud resources and your existing on-premises infrastructure, offering a balance of control, flexibility, and cost-effectiveness. However, managing a hybrid environment can be complex, requiring expertise in both cloud and on-premises technologies and introducing potential security concerns and network latency challenges.
Pros:
- Balances control, flexibility, and cost-effectiveness
- Leverages the strengths of both public cloud and on-premises infrastructure
Cons:
- Requires expertise in both cloud and on-premises technologies
- Security concerns and potential latency issues may arise
Which approach is right for you?
The best approach depends on your specific needs and priorities. You might want to answer a set of questions before you decide which cloud strategy to choose.
This may include questions like, Do you need the highest performance and scalability possible? Is flexibility and avoiding vendor lock-in crucial? Do you have existing on-premises infrastructure or need specific regulatory compliance? What are your budget and skillset limitations? And many more — the choice depends on your specific needs.
And don’t be afraid to experiment! You can even use different approaches for different applications within your organization.
Ultimately, why not discuss your cloud options with experts who can help you decide the best cloud strategy for you? You can schedule a free consultation with us to discuss the different options you have.
⛅ What are the benefits of having a cloud partner? Find out in our free ebook.
FAQs
A cloud-native approach can be ideal for organizations that prioritize high performance, scalability, and rapid development within a specific cloud environment. On the other hand, cloud-agnostic applications and systems are designed to be independent of any specific cloud provider.
What is the difference between cloud-native and agnostic? ›
Cloud-agnostic services are different from cloud-native applications as they do not rely on the tools provided by a single cloud platform. Instead, they integrate with open-source and vendor-provided tools in various ways.
What is an example of cloud-agnostic? ›
Examples of cloud-agnostic applications: Kubernetes: An open-source container orchestration system that can run on any cloud platform. It enables developers to deploy and manage containerized applications across multiple clouds.
What is the right cloud strategy? ›
A cloud-right strategy pursues the best strategy that balances an organization's unique circ*mstances and goals when adding, creating, or updating applications or infrastructure to an IT environment.
What is the cloud agnostic strategy? ›
A cloud-agnostic architecture aims to design applications that can run seamlessly across any cloud provider. Unlike cloud-native applications, cloud-agnostic services are not dependent on a single cloud platform's toolkit. Instead, they integrate with a mix of open-source and vendor-provided tools.
What are the benefits of cloud agnostic? ›
Cloud agnosticism
Almost infinite scalability, cost efficiency, reduced management overhead, and high flexibility are just some of the features that public clouds provide. All these can be used to gain an advantage over competitors.
Which cloud approach is the best and why? ›
A cloud-native approach can be ideal for organizations that prioritize high performance, scalability, and rapid development within a specific cloud environment. On the other hand, cloud-agnostic applications and systems are designed to be independent of any specific cloud provider.
Why is cloud-native better? ›
High Availability and Resiliency
In addition, cloud-native applications are more resilient because they are built using microservices, which are independent, loosely coupled building blocks that make up the application. Even if one of those components fails, the application continues to function.
Why choose cloud-native? ›
Cloud-native technology allows companies to build resilient and highly available applications. Feature updates do not cause downtime and companies can scale up app resources during peak seasons to provide a positive customer experience.
What is cloud-native examples? ›
For example, cloud-native services might describe the as-a-service offerings from cloud service providers (for example, Iaas, PaaS, and SaaS service models), the microservices of an application, and the APIs that connect and enable communication between services.
Kubernetes itself is cloud-agnostic and the fact that it's open-source may imply no vendor lock-in. However, all real-world installations come with quite an opposite experience. With managed Kubernetes, the vendor of the compute layer is the vendor of the Kubernetes distribution as well.
Is Snowflake cloud agnostic? ›
Cloud Agnostic:
Snowflake's cloud-agnostic nature means that organizations have the flexibility to choose their preferred cloud provider, whether it's AWS, Azure, or GCP. This freedom allows businesses to align their data strategy with their existing cloud infrastructure and expertise.
What is your cloud-first strategy? ›
A cloud-first strategy allows organizations to leverage the scalability and performance capabilities of the cloud. By provisioning servers, databases, and other services on-demand, organizations can enhance performance and reduce latency, especially with multiple data centers globally.
What is the purpose of a cloud strategy? ›
A cloud strategy is the plan an organization follows to host its IT infrastructure in a cloud environment. By outlining the cloud's architecture, development plans and governance model, cloud strategies help ensure effective performance of the infrastructure, workloads and applications hosted in the cloud.
Does cloud-native mean serverless? ›
Serverless computing is a cloud-native model where the cloud provider fully manages the underlying server infrastructure. Developers use serverless computing because the cloud infrastructure automatically scales and configures to meet application requirements. Developers only pay for the resources the application uses.
What is the difference between cloud-native and cloud services? ›
Cloud native applications make the best use of cloud services and features, which allows them to be highly flexible, scalable, and resilient. On the other hand, cloud-enabled refers to applications or systems that were originally designed for on-premises environments but have been adapted to work in the cloud.
What is meant by cloud-native? ›
Defining cloud native
The term cloud native refers to the concept of building and running applications to take advantage of the distributed computing offered by the cloud delivery model. Cloud native apps are designed and built to exploit the scale, elasticity, resiliency, and flexibility the cloud provides.
What is the difference between cloud and native? ›
With cloud-native, you remove the notion of paying for resources that you do not actively use. Unlike cloud-based, where charges are for the whole stack - cloud-native apps are built in such a way that costs are calculated based on the resources the app consumes.
